International Journals, Ethics and AI

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Athena de Albuquerque Farias

Métricas

Carregando Métricas ...

Detalhes do artigo

Como Citar
Farias, A. de A. (2025). International Journals, Ethics and AI. Amadeus International Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(18), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.14295/aimj.v9i18.231
Seção
Editorial
Biografia do Autor

Athena de Albuquerque Farias, Instituto Persona de Educação

Advogada pelo Centro Universitário dos Guararapes – UNIFG, Pernambuco, Brasil. Especialista em Direito
Processual do Trabalho pela Faculdades Integradas de Cruzeiro – SP. Mestrado em Sustainable Development pela Università degli Studi di Milano, Milão, Itália. Doutoranda em Educação pela Universidade do Minho, Minho Portugal. Editora Adjunta do Periódico Científico Id on Line Revista Mutidisciplinar e de Psicologia.
Diretora do Instituto Persona de Educação, Pernambuco, Brasil.

Referências

1. Elsevier. (2025). Generative AI policies for journals. Elsevier. Accessed November 20, 2025]. https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/generative-ai-policies-for-journals

2. Science. (2025). Science journals: editorial policies. Science. [Accessed November 20, 2025]. https://www.science.org/content/page/science-journals-editorial-policies

3. Yoo, J.-H. (2025). Defining the boundaries of AI use in scientific writing: A comparative review of editorial policies. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 40(23), e187. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e187

4. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. ICMJR. [Updated 2023]. [Accessed November 1, 2025]. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/.

5. Zielinski, C., Winker, M. A., Aggarwal, R., Ferris, L. E., Heinemann, M., Lapeña, J. F., et al. (2024). Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 40(1), 11–13.

6. Bagenal, J., Biamis, C., Boillot, M., Brierley, R., Chew, M., Dehnel, T., Frankish, H., Grainger, E., Pope, J., Prowse, J., Samuel, D., Slogrove, A. L., Stacey, J., Thapaliya, G., Trethewey, F., Wang, H. H., Varley-Reeves, J., & Kleinert, S. (2024). Generative AI: ensuring transparency and emphasising human intelligence and accountability. The Lancet, 404(10468), 2142–2143. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02615-1

7. Ateriya, N., Sonwani, N. S., Thakur, K. S., Kumar, A., & Verma, S. K. (2025). Exploring the ethical landscape of AI in academic writing. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-025-00453-1

8. Kocak, Z. (2024). Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 39(33), e249. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e249

9. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2023). Authorship and AI tools: COPE position statement. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author

10. Burton, E., Goldsmith, J., Koenig, S., Kuipers, B., Mattei, N., & Walsh, T. (2017). Ethical considerations in artificial intelligence courses. AI Magazine, 38(2), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i2.2731

11. Goldsmith, J., & Burton, E. (2017). Why teaching ethics to AI practitioners is important. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11139

Artigos Semelhantes

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.