International Journals, Ethics and AI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/aimj.v9i18.231Keywords:
AI, Ethics, PublicationMetrics
References
1. Elsevier. (2025). Generative AI policies for journals. Elsevier. Accessed November 20, 2025]. https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/generative-ai-policies-for-journals
2. Science. (2025). Science journals: editorial policies. Science. [Accessed November 20, 2025]. https://www.science.org/content/page/science-journals-editorial-policies
3. Yoo, J.-H. (2025). Defining the boundaries of AI use in scientific writing: A comparative review of editorial policies. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 40(23), e187. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e187
4. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. ICMJR. [Updated 2023]. [Accessed November 1, 2025]. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/.
5. Zielinski, C., Winker, M. A., Aggarwal, R., Ferris, L. E., Heinemann, M., Lapeña, J. F., et al. (2024). Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 40(1), 11–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2023.2286102
6. Bagenal, J., Biamis, C., Boillot, M., Brierley, R., Chew, M., Dehnel, T., Frankish, H., Grainger, E., Pope, J., Prowse, J., Samuel, D., Slogrove, A. L., Stacey, J., Thapaliya, G., Trethewey, F., Wang, H. H., Varley-Reeves, J., & Kleinert, S. (2024). Generative AI: ensuring transparency and emphasising human intelligence and accountability. The Lancet, 404(10468), 2142–2143. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02615-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02615-1
7. Ateriya, N., Sonwani, N. S., Thakur, K. S., Kumar, A., & Verma, S. K. (2025). Exploring the ethical landscape of AI in academic writing. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-025-00453-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-025-00453-1
8. Kocak, Z. (2024). Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 39(33), e249. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e249
9. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2023). Authorship and AI tools: COPE position statement. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author
10. Burton, E., Goldsmith, J., Koenig, S., Kuipers, B., Mattei, N., & Walsh, T. (2017). Ethical considerations in artificial intelligence courses. AI Magazine, 38(2), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i2.2731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i2.2731
11. Goldsmith, J., & Burton, E. (2017). Why teaching ethics to AI practitioners is important. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11139
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Athena de Albuquerque Farias

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



