International Journals, Ethics and AI

Main Article Content

Athena de Albuquerque Farias

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Farias, A. de A. (2025). International Journals, Ethics and AI. Amadeus International Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(18), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.14295/aimj.v9i18.231
Section
Editorial
Author Biography

Athena de Albuquerque Farias, Instituto Persona de Educação

 Bachelor of Laws by the Guararapes University Center – UNIFG, Pernambuco, Brazil. Specialist in Labor Procedural Law by the Integrated Faculties of Cruzeiro – São Paulo, Brazil.. Master's degree in Sustainable Development by the University of Milan, Milan, Italy. PhD candidate in Education by the University of Minho, Minho, Portugal. Associate Editor of the scientific journal Id on Line Multidisciplinary and Psychology Journal. Director of the Persona Institute of Education, Pernambuco, Brazil. 

References

1. Elsevier. (2025). Generative AI policies for journals. Elsevier. Accessed November 20, 2025]. https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/generative-ai-policies-for-journals

2. Science. (2025). Science journals: editorial policies. Science. [Accessed November 20, 2025]. https://www.science.org/content/page/science-journals-editorial-policies

3. Yoo, J.-H. (2025). Defining the boundaries of AI use in scientific writing: A comparative review of editorial policies. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 40(23), e187. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e187

4. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. ICMJR. [Updated 2023]. [Accessed November 1, 2025]. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/.

5. Zielinski, C., Winker, M. A., Aggarwal, R., Ferris, L. E., Heinemann, M., Lapeña, J. F., et al. (2024). Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 40(1), 11–13.

6. Bagenal, J., Biamis, C., Boillot, M., Brierley, R., Chew, M., Dehnel, T., Frankish, H., Grainger, E., Pope, J., Prowse, J., Samuel, D., Slogrove, A. L., Stacey, J., Thapaliya, G., Trethewey, F., Wang, H. H., Varley-Reeves, J., & Kleinert, S. (2024). Generative AI: ensuring transparency and emphasising human intelligence and accountability. The Lancet, 404(10468), 2142–2143. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02615-1

7. Ateriya, N., Sonwani, N. S., Thakur, K. S., Kumar, A., & Verma, S. K. (2025). Exploring the ethical landscape of AI in academic writing. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-025-00453-1

8. Kocak, Z. (2024). Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 39(33), e249. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e249

9. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2023). Authorship and AI tools: COPE position statement. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author

10. Burton, E., Goldsmith, J., Koenig, S., Kuipers, B., Mattei, N., & Walsh, T. (2017). Ethical considerations in artificial intelligence courses. AI Magazine, 38(2), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i2.2731

11. Goldsmith, J., & Burton, E. (2017). Why teaching ethics to AI practitioners is important. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11139

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.